TOP302

 

folderedge.jpg
folderbar.jpg

[HOME] [TECH LIBRARY] [R-VALUES] [historyofinsulation]

Masonry Insulation HIstory

History of Insulation with Masonry

By Charles Ostrander & Jonathon Satko

Related External Links

  BIA Tech Notes Online

  NCMA Techical Notes

 

History of Insulation with Masonry

HIGHER ENERGY COSTS AND CODES DEMAND GREATER EFFICIENCY FIGURE-1

There is a story of a young architect today analyzing a building constructed in the 1950s with solid masonry walls and single paned glass used on the exterior of the structure. That young architect referred to the building as an "old, masonry, energy inefficient building." In the present context of the 21st century, it is not energy efficient using today's standards. But, when it was built, as with most other buildings at that time, very little insulation was used because energy was a cheap commodity and architects and owners did not require use of insulation in their building envelopes.

Insulation and other techniques for energy conservation are coming to the fore today. Therefore, masonry buildings and other building types have been upgraded with different types of insulation strategies. The use (in the 1950s and 1960s) of zonolite, vermiculite and perlite was used initially in the cores of concrete masonry units and wall cavity's to increase the masonry's marginal thermal performance. This satisfied the increased energy demands. In the earlier part of the 20th century, some insulation materials utilized on the inside of ice houses built in Chicago were horse hair and cork.

 

CAVITY WALL HISTORY: 200 YEARS

IN THE EARLIER PART OF THE 20TH CENTURY, SOME INSULATION MATERIALS UTILIZED ON THE INSIDE OF ICE HOUSES BUILT IN CHICAGO WERE HORSE HAIR AND CORK.

Cavity walls are not new, they have been observed in ancient Greek and Roman structures. At the Greco-Roman town of Pergamum, on the hills overlooking the Turkish town of Bergama, a stone wall of cavity type construction still exists.

Sometime in the early part of the 19th century, the cavity wall was rediscovered by the British. Plans dating as early as 1805 suggest a type of cavity wall construction. It featured two leaves (wythes) of brick, bonded by brick headers, spanning across a 6" cavity. An early British publication (dated 1821) suggests the use of cavity walls as a means of protection against moisture penetration. The use of metal ties was introduced in Southern England sometime after 1850 . These original ties were made of wrought iron.

Cavity walls were first built in the United States late in the 19th century. Figure 1 illustrates an alternate type of cavity wall system originally featured in an 1899 text book assembled for people engaged in the engineering professions and construction trades. However, it was not until 1937 that this type of construction gained official acceptance by any building or construction agency in the United States. Since then, interest in and use of cavity walls in this country has rapidly increased. This has resulted in extensive testing to determine cavity wall properties and performance.

BATT INSULATION

Unfaced thermal batt insulation complies with ASTM C665, Type I and ASTM E136. Kraft-faced thermal batt insulation complies with ASTM C665, Type II, Class C. Foil-faced thermal batt insulation complies with ASTM C665, Type III, Class B and C.

NOMINAL FRAMING DEPTH AND SPACING

"LABELED" BATT INSULATION R-VALUE (BETWEEN STEEL STUDS)

"EFFECTIVE" R-VALUE WITH BATT INSULATION AND STEEL STUDS

WALL THERMAL EFFICIENCY(1)

4" @ 16" O.C.

R-11

5.5

50%

R-13

6.0

46%

R-15

6.4

43%

4" @ 24" O.C.

R-11

6.6

60%

R-13

7.2

55%

R-15

7.8

52%

6" @ 16" O.C.

R-19

7.1

37%

R-21

7.4

35%

6" @ 24" O.C.

R-19

8.6

45%

R-21

9.0

43%

(1) Data Source: ASHRAE/EIS Standard 90.1 Ñ 1999, Appendix A.

Thermal batts are flexible, fiberglass insulation. It is made in R-values from 11 to 38. The product is manufactured in thicknesses from 3 1/2" to 12". The batts must be kept dry to maintain the stated R Ðvalues. Insulation that has become wet should be inspected for evidence of residual moisture and contamination, and any insulation that is contaminated should be promptly removed and replaced. Batt insulation's R-value is adversely affected by the presence of moisture. Due to thermal bridging, with just batt insulation between steel studs, a wall's thermal efficiency is lowered 50% to 65%.

 

The early use of cavity walls in this country was limited primarily to exterior load -bearing walls in low rise construction. In the 1940s, designers began to recognize the advantages of cavity walls in high-rise buildings. Today, masonry cavity walls are the preferred wall system and are used extensively throughout the United States in all types of buildings. The primary reasons for their popularity are: superior resistance to rain penetration, excellent thermal properties, excellent resistance to sound transmission and high resistance to fire.

At the first North American Masonry Conference (1978), at the University of Colorado Boulder, masonry design professionals and research professors gathered from around the world for paper presentations and discussion. Water penetration and solid masonry walls were being discussed along with the now more accepted insulated cavity wall currently being designed and constructed in America.

Timber West, an elder scholar from England, who had an Albert Einstein white head of hair and a white handle bar mustache, addressed the crowd. He cleared his throat and said, "When are you bloody Colonialists going to learn that if you want to build brick masonry walls that won't leak, you have to build a cavity wall. We (British) have been doing it for the last 200 years" He silenced the audience.

 

 

MODERN ERA OF INSULATED MASONRY WALLS

The insulation used in masonry buildings changed drastically in the mid 70s due to the Arab oil embargo. Long lines of cars waiting to get gas along with increased energy demands promulgated new energy codes Ð this phenomenon changed the design world. Requirements for minimum R-values for various types of construction came into being. Masonry, concrete and precast industries were given credit for their mass in tempering the exterior temperature fluctuation. To meet these needs, a variety of insulations were used.

  • BATT INSULATION
  • EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE
  • EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE
  • PHENOLIC FOAM
  • POLYISOCYNAURATE INSULATION

 

DESIGN CHALLENGES FIGURE-2

The need for higher R-valued walls presented a design problem for architects. Traditionally architects designed buildings for commercial, industrial and residential applications. The most economical wall system in the past was solid masonry walls composed of three wythes (or layers) of brick and/or one wythe of brick tied into an 8" concrete masonry back up. The only place you could put rigid insulation in solid walls was on the inside of the building. This gave rise to the use of cavity walls composed of an exterior 4" brick wythe of masonry, a cavity consisting of an air space and closed cell rigid insulation and an interior wythe of the 8" concrete masonry. (Figure 2)

The history of cavity walls goes back many hundreds of years, but the greatest impetus for its use is for a more rain resistant type of wall system compared to solid masonry. In addition, it was more energy efficient as a corollary. Below are various wall cross sections and the R-value of the total wall system including the insulation selected. It is hoped this is of assistance to you in designing energy efficient walls in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

Expanded Polystyrene (XPS)

ASTM C578 Standard Specification for Preformed Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation - Expanded Polystyrene.

TYPE

XI

I

VIII

II

IX

R-VALUE /IN @ 75 DEG. F.

3.1

3.6

3.8

4.0

4.2

DENSITY, MIN PCF

0.7

0.9

1.15

1.35

1.8

WATER ABSORPTION MAX, % BY VOL.

4

4

3

3

2

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH MIN PSI

5

10

13

15

25

Must be protected with 1/2" drywall. (15 minutes of fire protection or greater.)

Extruded Polystyrene (XPS)

ASTM C578 Standard Specification for Preformed Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation - Extruded Polystyrene.

TYPE

XI

I

VIII

II

IX

R-VALUE /IN @ 75 DEG. F.

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

DENSITY, MIN PCF

1.35

1.60

1.80

2.20

3.00

WATER ABSORPTION MAX, % BY VOL.

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH MIN PSI

15

25

40

60

100

WVP MAX. PERM FOR 1"

1.1

1.1

1.1

1.1

1.1

Must be protected with 1/2" drywall. (15 minutes of fire protection or greater.)

Polyisocyanurate (ISO)

ASTM C1289-2001 Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellullar Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board.

TYPE

I

I

II

II

CLASS

I

II

I

II

FACER

FOIL/FOIL

FOIL/FOIL

FELT OR GLASS

POLYMER BONDED

R-VALUE /IN @ 75 DEG. F.

6.5

6.5

5.6

5.3

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH MIN PSI

20

20

 

20

GRADE I  - 20 PSI

GRADE II - 20 PSI

GRADE III - 25 PSI

WATER ABSORPTION MAX, % BY VOL.

1.0

1.0

1.5

1.5

WVP MAX. PERM FOR 1"

0.3

0.3

1.0

4.0

 

Most cavity applications use Type X or Type IV. All roof and interior wall systems incorporating extruded polystyrene insulation must consider adequate fire protection. Coverings such as 15 minute thermal barriers (1/2" drywall) or other alternatives based on building code diversified tests are regarded as acceptable in most applications.

 

Picture

{HOME} {TECHNICAL LIBRARY} {INDUSTRY DIRECTORY}